2009-Oct-20 - UK savers forced into investment vehicles

The way people save has undergone a fundamental shift, but not a lot of people have noticed the change.

Traditionally, people would save into a high interest savings account, where the interest rate would be reasonably competitive, could vary from time to time, with higher rate accounts offering higher returns the less you touched your money (ie, notice accounts).

Those people with a lot of money to save would often look to save their money in multiple accounts with multiple savings providers, and those in the higher income bracket focus more on saving into an offshore bank account.

While there were additional savings options for tax-free interest, such as TESSA's, PEP's, then ISA's, and variations on savings such as the premium bonds, that was as complicated as it got.

Those who did not want to invest in stocks and shares, mutual funds or index funds, futures, bonds, or other investment vehicles as part of a portfolio, remained just savers.

What has happened since the financial crisis happened is now those savers have become investors, without realising it.

Savings rates have been slashed as the Bank of England dropped central banking rates through the floor to the record lows.

The result? Most current accounts now pay 0% interest, and savings accounts rarely offer more than 1.5% .

However, many savings providers are now offering higher rate savings through fixed rate bond accounts, where interest rates can be 4% or more above the Bank of England's base rate, so long as you lock you money in to the account for two, three, or five years.

The result is a major change in the savings landscape that few have even noticed, as savers are now finding themselves forced into putting their money into bonds for a fixed term. In effect, they are now investing in investment products, rather than saving in savings products.

The surprise is that only a few savings and investment brokers have noticed this change

While some commentators have suggested that 2009 saw the growth of green shoots in the economy, others remain adamant that we are looking at a W shaped recession.

Either way, it looks like the savings landscape is not going to change any time soon, and that fixed term plans will continue to force savers to become investors in all but name.

2009-Oct-20 - Moving to a new internet supplier

Well, it looks as though I'm finally moving ISP from Zen back to BT broadband, as I just called Zen for a MAC code.

It's a shame, really, as Zen has a far better reputation for service and support than BT, but the problem of wireless interference is a constant and annoying problem.

Plus BT are offering mobile broadband with their new broadband packages, and free BT openzone minutes, which will be very useful for business travel.

The caveat is that the pricing on the BT website is quite misleading, as those shown only apply to certain exchanges (apparently) plus they include 24-month pricing, which can take as much as 25%-30% off the 12-month price (so Option 3 is £45+VAT over 24 months, or £30+VAT over 12 months).

Still, at least I know from experience that the BT router supplied is far less susceptible to wireless intereference.

Which is very important, because if I couldn't get decent business broadband, I'd have to consider more serious broadband connection packages, such as a leased line or custom business SDSL, both of which are priced higher than normal mass-market broadband packages.

In the meantime, I can only hope the move to BT goes smoothly, and that I don't end up getting caught up in their cold automated support process - as BT customer service is not renown for being good.

2009-Oct-20 - UK economic woes continue

The more I read about the impact of the financial crisis in the UK, the more it feels that the UK is doomed economically, and that the best option now while you have cash in Great British Sterling is to cash out and move aborad to somewhere more financially sound - ie, not threatened with collapse by the weight of its own debt.

That may seem somewhat alarmist, but despite the claims of "green shoots" earlier in the year, we have not seen any signs that the economy is returning to normal. In fact, anything but, and that at best we're moving into a "lost decade" similar as to what happened to Japan.

Britain's debt to GDP is spiralling out of control, and even measures to reduce costs being mooted by Labour and the Conservatives are plain in their limitations - we are in far too much of a hole to be able to dig us out even within the next Parliament. It's going to take a full decade to even begin to expect to bring British debt to normality, and during this period, there is no reason to presume the economy will fare any better.

Repossessions continue to be high, insolvencies are expected to increase, and consumer debt is growing through credit cards and loans at a time when paying are supposedly paying off debt. Unemployment continues to increase in leaps and bounds (forget that's its slowing - double dip, people), and rather than help employers hire, the government is actually going to tax companies more for employing people.

In the meantime, ratings agencies expect at least a further 15% fall in house prices in the UK, and at a time when the market is limping forward, the FSA wants to bring in tougher rules on mortgages, while at the same time demanding banks hoard more cash.

And that's before we even get into the threats of deflation and unknown consequences of "Quantitive Easing".

The result of all these pieces in play can hardly be good for Britain - worsening debt, worsening access to credit, worsening consumer spending, falling asset prices, etc. The strategies in play may be different to Japan in the 90's, but the state of play is looking increasingly like it.

The problem, of course, is that while matters are exacerbated in the UK, these are afflictions across the world economy. So where is safe?

The answer is relative - the financial crisis is firmly rooted in the US and Europe, and while other areas have been impacted, their fundamantals have been far less knocked by comparison.

Asia remains strong and a bulwark so far against global financial collapse. While no doubt asset bubbles there are growing, they still don;t have the problem of being so invested in complex debt instruments that have so far crippled US and European banks.

Personally speaking, Thailand looks idyllic, but remains subject to Typhoons, as does much of East Asia. A good place to consider investing in, though.

South America is another emerging economy as well, not least in terms of investments, such as land for sale Brazil & property for sale Brazil. If South America itself seems a little rough, you could always consider moving towards central America, not least Panama, which remains under US control, and still offers a lot of decent property for sale Panama.

Australia or New Zealand could even be places worth considering moving to - close enough to Asia to feel the economic benefit, but heavily Anglicised.

In the meantime, now seems to be the moment to batten down the hatches or move on - economic power is clearly heading East, and to developing nations, and for those who remain, only the prophets of doom are left to comfort us.

2009-Feb-8 - Savers: paying twice for banks

This week’s move by the Bank of England to cut the interest rate to an all time low of 1% is a bad move for all of us, especially those trying to save money.

It is an unfortunate double whammy, because while the tax payer is subsidising the banking system via RBS and Lloyds especially though part nationalisation, plus through government guarantees and debt swaps with its special liquidity scheme, the cut in interest rates especially benefits the banks by increasing their profit margins.

A major way banks make their profit is through arbitrage between savings rates on loan rates. In other words, the bank offers a relatively low interest rate to savers, a relatively higher rate to borrowers, and the difference in between is profit.

The problem is that while savings rates have come down a lot, especially as the Bank of England cuts interest rates, the actual borrowing rates remain comparatively high.

For example, with mortgages, it used to be the case that tracker rates would follow the Bank of England’s rate up and down. If they still did this, then many people would be feeling the benefits.

However, lenders have now instituted a “mortgage tracker rate” which means the tracker rate they offer is a few full percentiles about the Bank of England’s interest rate, but does not necessarily comes down if the Bank of England’s interest rate is cut.

Many previous tracker mortgages also came with a mortgage floor which effectively means that the tracker mortgage will not come down below a certain rate, even if the Bank of England interest rate continues to fall.

Coupling the constant cutting of interest rates on savings, with the artificially high mortgage repayment rates, means that the UK’s banks are cashing in at the detriment to the very consumer’s whose taxes are keeping such banks afloat.

We as a nation are therefore hit by a double whammy of subsidising the UK banks directly through billions in government support, and additionally by the banks ensuring that interest rate cuts actually boost their own profit margins.

Not many people are aware of just how depressingly manipulated we are being used to help support the very institutions, whose greed and maladministration brought us into what appears to be a deep recession, and yet it will be the banks who end up profiting most from it.

2009-Feb-8 - Starting blogging at Normblogs